Report on SECAC 2012

Report on SECAC Southeastern College Art Conference 2012: “Reflections on Where We Are and Where We Are Going with Technology in the Art History Classroom,” chaired by Marjorie Och, University of Mary Washington.

AHPT sponsored a demonstration-workshop at the annual meeting of the Southeastern College Art Conference in Savannah in November 2011. SCAD hosted the event, and we were particularly grateful to Sandra J. Reed (professor of painting at SCAD) and her colleagues for offering AHPT a classroom at SCAD’s Jen Library that accommodated our session’s need for computer work-stations and internet accessibility. The session, “Reflections on Where We Are and Where We Are Going with Technology in the Art History Classroom,” introduced SECAC members to some new technologies and tools, offered opportunities to try these out with the presenters, and established AHPT in SECAC as a vital group for discussion, networking, and sharing pedagogical insights. The presenters were Fran Altvater (Hillyer College, University of Hartford) on Wikis, Podcasts, and Blogs; Oh, My! Technology and Pedagogy in Parallel in the Art History Classroom, Janice Robertson (Pratt Institute) with VoiceThread Class Projects Turn Text-Based Teaching Practices On Their Head, and Saul Zalesch (Louisiana Tech University) on and Bringing Original Art Ephemera into the Classroom.

Fran talked about ways we might use technology to address “real deficiencies our students have in fundamental academic skills, time management, and academic culture” so our students might achieve greater success in degree programs. She showed us how wikis can be used for group note-taking, and audio casting of her lectures can help her work with a variety of student learning styles. Janice, art history’s VoiceThread guru, walked us through the steps of developing a VoiceThread and demonstrated her students’ academic revelations in their study of sculptural details on the façade of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in NYC. Janice also discussed how she uses VoiceThread to present works to students in a survey-level class that they probably don’t know, and then challenges them to figure out what they are looking at based on her lectures, their readings, and their pursuit of knowledge as they work to identify objects in small VoiceThread groups. Saul presented his website,, dedicated to his personal collection of American ephemera (destined for the Winterthur Museum) that he uses in his art history classes to teach, among other things, how “high style” is echoed in a variety of popular media, and how we can study art and history in such objects as late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century posters, advertisements, and music sheets; as an added treat he brought objects from his collection to show the group.

This was AHPT’s first session as an affiliate of SECAC, and we’re looking forward to a long and mutually rewarding relationship in the coming years. AHPT will sponsor a session at SECAC in 2012…so be looking for this! If any members wish to chair a session at SECAC or CAA in the future, please contact me at or Sarah Scott at

Report on CAA 2011

CAA 2011, New York
Business Meeting, Wednesday, February 9, 7:30-9am

Session: Technology and Collaboration in the Art History Classroom
Wednesday, February 9, 9:30-12pm
Chair: Marjorie Och, University of Mary Washington

Team-Based Wiki Building
Kathryn Bunn-Marcuse, University of Washington

Step Away from the Podium! Adjusting Our Teaching Style to Accommodate Interactive Classroom Learning
Susan Healy, Metropolitan Community College, Omaha

The Sound of Art: Audio-Casting and Student Engagement
Frances Altvater, University of Hartford Hillyer College

Look, Listen, Speak, Text, Draw: VoiceThread TM Changes the Balance of Power
Janice Lynn Robertson, Fashion Institute of Technology

Collaboration in the Virtual Classroom: A Few Strategies that Work
Eva J. Allen, independent art historian

Report on CAA 2009

CAA 2009 Los Angeles
Session 1. Dr. Stephen Carroll, “Pedagogy of Assessment: Assessment of Pedagogy (Taking the Sting out of Assessment).” A 1.5-hour lecture and workshop.

Session 2. Web 2.0 and Art History
Chairs: Kelly Donahue-Wallace, University of North Texas; Eva Allen, University of Maryland University College

Whose Textbook is it Anyway? SmARThistory and Web 2.0
Beth Harris, Fashion Institute of Technology
Steven Zucker, Fashion Institute of Technology

Off With Their Heads: Using Digital Learning Objects to Teach the French Revolution
Andrea Fredericksen, University College London

Case Study: Using Collaborative Technologies to Develop an Online Exhibit in an Art History Seminar
Marjorie Och, University of Mary Washington

The Wagnerpedia “Survey”: A Wiki-Based Study of the Introduction to Art History
Sarah Scott, Wagner College

Visualizing the Maternal Form: Using Wikis for Collaboration in a Graduate Seminar
Denise Baxter, University of North Texas

Toward a Global Local Art History: Wiki to the Rescue
Alan Moore, independent scholar, Staten Island

Report on CAA 2007

CAA 2007 New York
Innovative Course Design Competition

Winner: John Garton, Cleveland Institute of Art, Course: “Curatorial Studies: The Art of Dreams, Escape, and Reverie”

Martha Scotford, NC State University

Marcia Salo, Parsons, The New School, NYC

Sherry C.M. Lindquist, Knox College

Mary Quinlan-McGrath, Northern Illinois University

Report on CAA 2006

2006 Boston
Teaching Art History Online

Chair: Kelly Donahue-Wallace, University of North Texas

Tradition and Innovation: Using New Technologies in Art History Surveys: A Case Study
Eva Allen, University of Maryland

An Orchid in the Land of Art History
Robert Sweeney, Indiana University of Pennsylvania

The Digital Image Library as Social Learning Environment
Beth Harris, Fashion Institute of Technology
Steven Zucker, Fashion Institute of Technology

If You Build It, The Might Not Come: Remarks on Motivating Participation in Online Art History Courses
Geoffrey Simmins, University of Calgary

Pedagogy and Technology (AHPT) 2014 session at CAA in Chicago

Visual Histories in Virtual Spaces: Engaging Students Through Technology

Chair: Judy Bullington, PhD, Chair of the Department of Art and Professor of Art History, Belmont University in Nashville, TN

New technologies and online learning environments create an opportunity for a conceptual rethinking of the way that students learn the histories of art. In a series of ten-minute presentations, participants will demonstrate one innovative way they use technology in their classrooms to enhance student learning and the overall effectiveness of teaching of art history whether the classroom is flipped, traditional, or online. Examples include pedagogical approaches to object-based learning in an environment that simulates actual viewing experiences such as curating for a virtual gallery, or the development of learning activities that engage students through online game-like platforms. Best practices, especially those that transition students from being passive ‘consumers’ of digital media to ‘producers’ of content, are highlighted as is the use of technology to enable student-centered discoveries as a means of illuminating dynamic relationships between historical knowledge and the visual arts. Inherent in this producer-based model is the need to address strategies for gaining a functional understanding of new media, interface design, and digital information fluency that make studies in art history relevant in, and responsive to, the changing landscape of higher education. While the presentations focus upon a series of specific and successful student projects, it is anticipated that this will lead to a broader set of discussions between the panelists and the audience around topics of mutual interest and concern, not the least of which is the implementation, assessment, and sustainability of technology-enhanced learning environments.


Why conduct you will need free of charge Musically tastes?

Ever used your children lip-sync in front of their smartphone? it’s often a decent opportunity he or she is here at Musical. Ly. Either a interpersonal network lets population screen their personal video clips as a rule to songs only to discuss them at the was feeling. Still left musically hearts without human verification tried Musical. Ly temporarily, i came away with two minds. Initial, I’m extremely adult. Minute, i even now fly what i mean children only to young people love the age. Video clips are all actually for making, but then so if you arranged quite a long time into it, you may make in fact clever clips. The tv reminds me personally of Vine you could rapidly drag together clever video clips in only 6 mere seconds. Nothing more than with Musical. Ly, you can obtain all the more tools. Plus, it’s often an opportunity to be always a star, if it is at the stage with nothing more than close households only to friends, or something larger. But then there’s also either a interpersonal network element of the tv. In theory, it’ll be locked down into a private network. That all, clearly, involves diligence on the part of either a mother or father. Now there also have been more than one former evaluations on the subject of strangers sending children suggestive mail messages, on the rise challenges on the subject of protection. (Musical. Ly discourages anyone under 13 obtained from still left a merchant account). Majority of with that said, it’s often extremely sizzling hot. Do not know the words Musical. Ly is certainly? not sure what i mean the body’s guy is indeed wild about it? here’s what you need to know:

What is Musical. Ly?

Its creators discuss the tv as the world’s largest creative policy, so where population screen video clips here at either an iOS or Android unit having a mixture of songs, lovely final results wish to have quite a long time lapses, only to filters to screen the others. Video clips are all highlighted to more than one categories, which include comedy, talent, sports, only to enlargement. The body’s was feeling is certainly so where you watch your personal Musical. Ly video clips, plus there’s a observe chapter to ascertain video clips by just category, trending tag, or song reply to. Gleam leaderboard highlighting the top musers.

How sizzling hot is certainly Musical. Ly?

Either a app guarantees during the period of a hundred million population, on the basis of the app’s on the subject of page here at Tumblr. Musical. Ly guarantees due to the fact liberating here at 2014, the tv has reached the top arranged here at Apple’s App wall plug here at 20 nations, such as the U. S. It’s often one of the maximum photo only to video applications here at Apple’s App wall plug, hovering between the maximum 50 only to maximum a hundred overall in the last 1 year, as per analytics institution App Annie. Here at Android, Musical. Ly sits over the maximum 25 applications downloaded here at Google have done. Why is it as such sizzling hot?

As a general rule, the tv lets population screen only to star within their personal personal songs video clips. A minor overview of the top video clips at the applications screen majority of population lip-syncing to sizzling hot songs. Will i get worried on the subject of my children playing the tv?

Former evaluations possess surfaced of alarmed parents being improper fulfilled shipped by just strangers to their children. A personal declaration associated with the brand-new Zealand Herald detail either a was feeling associated with the mother here at Australia who all listed her 8-year-old daughter gained mail messages obtained from a partner pretending of being Justin Bieber. Wish to have majority of interpersonal mass media applications, Musical. Ly profiles are all perceived by just default, that might turn on population to improper mail messages. In a chapter on the part of parents, Musical. Ly discourages any population under 13 obtained from environment a merchant account, and offers sources here at Internet privacy only to cyberbullying. “We motivate you to take a dynamic part here at the body’s teens Internet facial,” reads an excerpt. Either a app’s operators couldn’t act as used on the part of comment upon this tale. Just how do i preserve them?

A personal critical reply to Musical. Ly presents is certainly environment the body’s finance to personal. The age lets population screen who wants to follow them only to either specify or dip. It also stops anyone obtained from directly sending mail messages if you do not possess exceeded them due to the fact lovers (Musical. Ly’s adaptation of lovers). Whether it be the body’s was feeling is certainly perceived, you will even now decide to nothing more than allow friends to send mail messages. Musical. Ly data files actually with personal finance, detail which include was feeling picture, username, only to a short bio are all recognizable to almost everyone. Either a app advises parents to talk to children on the subject of don’t you revealing “personal detail, which include generation, address, or mobile phone number here at his/her was feeling. “

Musical. Ly also offers opportunities to prevent population only to declaration them on the part of abuse.

April 2013 Newsletter

Dear Friends of AHPT,


As spring arrives, we look forward to blossoming ideas!  In this newsletter, we summarize discussion that occurred at the CAA meeting during AHPT’s ‘content’ session and the business meeting.  We also have included a call for submissions to parties interested in chairing our 2014 content session in Chicago.   And finally, we invite you all to sign up for our email list, if you have not already!


AHPT’s ‘content’ session in New York City entitled ‘Rock the Pedagogical Boat: Open Mic + Tweet #caa2013rock,’ was very successful; many thanks to Janice, Gale, and Janhavi!  Over 50 participants talking, tweeting, and listening in the room, were joined by participants tweeting from other parts of the conference!  Everyone in the session had a chance to participate and received a ‘speaker’ ribbon.  It was an engaging venue resulting in a treasure-trove of ideas about pedagogy and technology, two topics that were sometimes discussed in relation to each other and other times independently.  Participants shared tools and methodologies around teaching, including innovative ways to generate class discussion, problem-based learning strategies for research papers and exhibit projects (role-playing!), interactive lecture formats, and non-traditional classroom learning environments (How can images outside the traditional realm of Art History serve as learning tools?).  There was much discussion of student-centered learning strategies and ‘flipped’ classrooms – how do we get students to think?!  How do we give them ownership?  How do we structure the classroom with continual activity and focus that is goal-oriented?  There was discussion about how which pedagogical and technological approaches are helpful for intro-level classes and upper-level courses.  Complementary and critical analysis of technological tools included discussions about Powerpoint, Prezi, Omeka, and Voicethread, to name a few, and examples were offered to make these tools better and more interactive.  Participants expressed their desires for more time to become comfortable using new tools, and questioned how important they were.  Assessment has never been more important!  A great many participants discussed concerns about the trajectory Higher Education is taking, as related to on-line learning, blended learning, and MOOCs. We were all interested in finding out more about THAT CAMP (more to come about THATCAMP and upcoming CAA conference in our next newsletter).   New resources were brought to our attention, including the Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy (, online writing tools (, and a possible new web resource  Watch our website ( for the 2013 AHPT session content to be posted soon!  In the follow-up (business) session there was more concentrated discussion of how issues of pedagogy and technology are being brought to faculty through various structures of IT departments within individual institutions, and there was discussion of how grant initiatives might be incorporated into next year’s session.  There was also more intense discussion about how we are approaching survey classes and the looming reality of on-line content and MOOCs.  The future of AHPT was discussed: changes in the website (we hope to have more active participation and contribution by members) and the call for officers was announced (we are still looking for a webmaster and treasurer or secretary – let Sarah know if you are interested in becoming involved!).


Are you interested in chairing the AHPT 2014 session at CAA in Chicago?  Later in the spring AHPT will submit a session proposal for the content (1 ½ hour) session.  Possible ideas include: 1. New approaches for the Art History Introduction Survey, 2. The future of Art History Pedagogy and Technology in an on-line Higher Education environment, 3. Institutional Relationships between Art History and IT and Pedagogical Departments. We will be accepting applications for chairs for this session.  If you have an idea, similar to or different than those above, please submit an application!  Send an abstract of no more that 250 words, with a brief bio and CV to Sarah ( and Marjorie (  The deadline for applications is May 15th.  The session can follow any type of format you choose – full participation (following the open-mic session from this year) or a more traditional series of papers.


Please share our news with anyone you know is interested in issues about teaching and technology!  We always welcome new members!  Membership is free, although we welcome contributions of $5 per annum to offset the cost of website management and CAA’s required fee from affiliate societies.  Visit the site to sign up for our email list (and newsletter) and contribute




Newsletter 2013, February

Dear Colleagues,


Happy 2013 from Art Historians Interested in Pedagogy and Technology!  You are receiving this message because you have either been a member of the society or have expressed interest in it.  This is the first in a new series of newsletters that we are inaugurating in order to generate a more active and dynamic society.  In this letter, we want to review AHPT’s activities, let you know what AHPT is up to this week at the CAA conference in New York, and give you a preview of new ideas the society will be discussing and implementing in the coming year.


AHPT was re-enlivened in 2011 beginning with a session at CAA, Technology and Collaboration in the Art History Classroom.  Marjorie Och chaired and there were presentations on interactive classroom technologies, audio-casting, wikis, Voicethread and virtual collaboration.  AHPT is also affiliated with the Southeastern College Art Conference.  Marjorie also chaired a session with SECAC in November 2011, “Reflections on Where We Are and Where We Are Going with Technology in the Art History Classroom.’ Presentation topics included wikis, podcasts, blogs, Voicethread, and web-authoring.  The 2012 CAA session, chaired by Sarah Scott, included a hands-on workshop session for participants to learn Voice-thread, Prezi, OMEKA, and online course authorship.  The past two years has also seen the creation of a new website,, where resources, publications, and details about conference proceedings have been posted.   The website is now open to the public, without membership dues.


This coming week will see another session of AHPT at CAA in New York.  Our session will be co-chaired by Janice Robertson and Gale Justin on Friday the 15th from 12:30-2 in Gramercy A, 2nd floor of the Hilton.  The session title is “Rock the Pedagogical Boat: Open Mic + Tweet #caa2013rock,” and will feature a dynamic discussion around ways that we use technology in our classrooms and how our pedagogical philosophies are changing. It will be a great opportunity to learn these technologies and share thoughts on teaching ideas.  We plan to distill a few topics from this session into roundtable discussion to continue in our business meeting, at 5:30 also in Gramercy A.  We strongly encourage anyone interested in teaching, technology, and the visual arts to participate in the roundtable and business session, as we will discus the future of AHPT, the appointment of officers, plans for the website, and the possible appointment of a new webmaster.  Marjorie Och (current President) and Sarah Scott (current Secretary and webmaster), very much look forward to encouraging participation of others to support a more active and dynamic society.  On that note, we will discuss the results of 2012 and 2013’s sessions to determine what topics members would like see addressed in future sessions.  We plan to generate newsletters to an active new mailing list on the website (please sign up in the sidebar on, we want to have more extensive ‘articles’ published on the website, contributed by members, and hope to discuss the management of membership – particularly how to manage the society without membership fees.


In short, we want 2013 to be the year AHPT becomes a more active society with an increase in membership.  We want to see more exchange of ideas and sharing of technology and pedagogy, and need your help to do it!


Additionally, we know that not all of you who have shared your emails with us will be at the conference this week, but we look forward to hearing from you nonetheless.  Therefore, we strongly urge you to sign up for our mailing list on the website.  Sarah will put together a post-CAA newsletter in order to update non-conference participants about things that happened at the conference.  Sign up and let us know your wishes for AHPT!  This letter and the post-CAA letter will be the only two that will be sent to you unless you sign up for the official list.  All future mailings and correspondence will be conducted through the email list (rather than through Sarah’s email, as this letter is).


We look forward to seeing/hearing from you all this week!


-Marjorie and Sarah.